Performing Identities: Post-Brexit Northern Ireland and the Reshaping of 21st-Century Governance, 2019-2020

DOI

Transcripts from interviews completed in the course of this ESRC-funded project. Participant Action Research (PAR) is a methodology frequently employed to assess the extent to which law is a culturally constructed phenomenon, an approach rooted in critical and feminist evaluations of rules governing personal relations (Sachs, 1992). This is an innovative methodology in the context of researching the interaction between novel constitutional arrangements and identity. Understandings of how identity can reshape legal constructs of citizenship are best forged when these legal arrangements are fluid, enhancing the value of participant action research in the context of post-Brexit NI (Kymlicka, 2003). Our participants, drawn from across a range of the new categories of rights holder created by the Withdrawal Agreement, engaged with the project team to reflect upon how the administrative actions which they are obliged to undertake are shaping their identities. The combination of in-depth interviews and workshops allowed us to explore identity as both individual and relational.In the Performing Identities project we investigate how identities in Northern Ireland will adapt to the profound changes in citizenship status and governance arrangements imposed by Brexit (and how they are, in turn, reshaping those arrangements). Brexit opens another chapter in the complicated constitutional and political situation in Northern Ireland. Since its creation in 1921 Northern Ireland's place within the United Kingdom has been unique. Through thirty years of conflict up to 1998 the people of Northern Ireland found themselves in an invidious position where cultural identity became bound up with citizenship, human rights and representation. Northern Ireland has therefore long experienced unorthodox governance arrangements, but the outline Withdrawal Agreement points towards it becoming an increasingly radical constitutional space. Although Northern Ireland will remain within the UK post Brexit, the consequences of regulatory alignment will be such that for many purposes it could effectively remain an EU territory. The outline Withdrawal Agreement also holds the potential to radically reshape identity in Northern Ireland. It makes provision for as many as nine different categories of rights holder and although it formally preserves the right of choice of identity, it stands to incentivise the holding of an Irish Passport (as a result of the retained EU citizenship rights thereby provided). The Withdrawal Agreement claims to align with the requirements of the Good Friday/Belfast Agreement, but it reshapes the ability of the people of Northern Ireland to choose their identity as British or Irish (Strand 1), alters the functioning of North-South Bodies (Strand 2) and stands to change relationship between the UK and Ireland (Strand 3). We examine how the efforts of the Withdrawal Agreement to preserve the Good Friday/Belfast Agreement end up reshaping the day-to-day functioning of its core ideas. Not all of these changes are necessarily negative; the advantages provided under the Withdrawal Agreement to EU citizens within Northern Ireland could ultimately help to dilute some of the persistent toxicity around identity (potentially leading more people who would self-identify as British to take Irish passports). Our aim is to establish the agency of NI's population in Brexit. We explore how EU, UK and Irish citizenship will be reshaped by their interactions with these new arrangements in the lead up to Brexit and in its early phases. The reclassification of legal categories of rights holder as part of Brexit will affect connected personal identities. Some people will be required to perform new identities to achieve classification as a rights holder (such as undertaking economic activity, becoming a dual national, marrying or entering a civil partnership). The enforcement of some nine legal categories of rights holder, upon which one's administrative identity hinges, will be devolved to employers, landlords and NHS administrators, creating difficulties for individuals who fall into unfamiliar categories. The uncertainty surrounding this process is already skewing underlying identities. To understand the impact of these changes we will engage in participant action research, working directly with a range of affected individuals in Northern Ireland and drawing upon their experiences to shape our research. Over the course of the 16 months of this project the new legal-political landscape of post-Brexit Northern Ireland will emerge. The project both assesses these changes and works to inform the people of Northern Ireland of their options and challenges that will lie ahead. It will also inform policy makers and civil society of the new landscape in which they operate. Through our intense focus on the case study of Northern Ireland we will come to better understand modern governance in the UK, Ireland and the EU and what Brexit means for local, devolved, national and European governance.

In-depth interviews in this project were designed and used to capture the lived experience of multiple understandings and practices of identity in the interview subject. To fully, or as fully as possible, captured this lived experience, we approached the interviews using methods that enabled us to keep the questions as open-ended and unstructured as possible, allowing the participant to guide the process. Core questions were identified and a semi-structured approach adopted to interviews in order to help guide the interviewer through any potential gaps or silences that may arise, as the identity of the subject is often felt more than articulated. Our participants were recruited through Northern Ireland Human Rights Consortium, and through calls issued on social media, namely the project's website and Twitter account. Participants recruited in this way signed up online to register their interest, and dates for interview were arranged thereafter. A number of small focus groups were also conducted. All information shared with us was on the basis of participants remaining unidentifiable in transcripts or materials published as part of this research. All participants were provided with an information sheet and consent form prior to interviews commencing. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and any identifying details (such as names, home towns etc.) have been redacted.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-854625
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=c1d178390933e1cbd64f6b71b92f90c1aa2bcfce4d341a8df7375eca21414ee5
Provenance
Creator Murray, C, Newcastle University; O'Donoghue, A, Durham University; de Mars, S, Newcastle University; Warwick, B, University of Birmingham; Armstrong, M, Liverpool John Moores University; Rice, C, Newcastle University
Publisher UK Data Service
Publication Year 2021
Funding Reference Economic and Social Research Council
Rights Colin Murray, Newcastle University. Aoife O'Donoghue, Durham University. Sylvia de Mars, Newcastle University. Ben Warwick, University of Birmingham. Megan Armstrong, Liverpool John Moores University. Clare Rice, Newcastle University; The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.
OpenAccess true
Representation
Resource Type Text
Discipline Social Sciences
Spatial Coverage Northern Ireland; United Kingdom