-
Coccolith percentage, relative abundance of sediment core GeoB1710-3
subtr.-trop species group = Discosphaera tubifera, Florisphaera profunda, Gladiolithus flabellatus, Rhabdosphaera clavigera, Syracosphaera spp., Umbellosphaera spp.,... -
Composition of the coccolith flora in sediment core GeoB1710-3
This dataset has no description
-
Abundance of coccoliths in sediment core GeoB1710-3
This dataset has no description
-
Composition of the coccolith flora in sediment core K708-007
This dataset has no description
-
Coccolithophores abundance at IODP Hole 385-U1549A in Guaymas Basin, Gulf of ...
The sedimentary samples studied came from cores of Hole 385-U1549A (27° 28.33167' N, 111° 28.7844' W) obtained during the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition... -
Range table from nannofossils in ODP Hole 171-1049A
This dataset has no description
-
Calcareous nannofossil distribution of sediment core MedSeA-S3-c1
This dataset has no description
-
Coccolith record during MIS 11 from ODP Hole 161-977A
This dataset has no description
-
(Table T2) Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil abundance in sediments of ODP L...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: D = dominant, >50% of the total assemblage, A = abundant, >10%-50% of the total assemblage, C = common, >1%-10%... -
(Table A7) Distribution of Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil marker species ...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20-<50 %), C = common (>10-<20%), F = few (>1-<10%), R =... -
(Table A6) Distribution of Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil marker species ...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20-<50 %), C = common (>10-<20%), F = few (>1-<10%), R =... -
(Table A5) Distribution of Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil marker species ...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20-<50 %), C = common (>10-<20%), F = few (>1-<10%), R =... -
(Table A4) Distribution of Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil marker species ...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20-<50 %), C = common (>10-<20%), F = few (>1-<10%), R =... -
(Table A3) Distribution of Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil marker species ...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20-<50 %), C = common (>10-<20%), F = few (>1-<10%), R =... -
(Table A2) Distribution of Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil marker species ...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20-<50 %), C = common (>10-<20%), F = few (>1-<10%), R =... -
(Table A1) Distribution of Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil marker species ...
Observed at a magnification of 1000X. Abundance of taxa: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20-<50 %), C = common (>10-<20%), F = few (>1-<10%), R =... -
(Table A3) Abundance of nannofossil marker species and morphotypes in sedimen...
Relative abundances of taxa or morphotypes were estimated as follows: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20 <50%), C = common (>10 <20%), F = few (>1... -
(Table A5) Abundance of nannofossil marker species and morphotypes in sedimen...
Relative abundances of taxa or morphotypes were estimated as follows: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20 <50%), C = common (>10 <20%), F = few (>1... -
(Table A4) Abundance of nannofossil marker species and morphotypes in sedimen...
Relative abundances of taxa or morphotypes were estimated as follows: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20 <50%), C = common (>10 <20%), F = few (>1... -
(Table A1) Abundance of nannofossil marker species and morphotypes in sedimen...
Relative abundances of taxa or morphotypes were estimated as follows: V = very abundant (>50%), A = abundant (>20 <50%), C = common (>10 <20%), F = few (>1...
