-
(Table 10) Distribution of Pleistocene to late Miocene nannofossils in ODP Ho...
Species abundance: A = abundant (>10% of the total assemblage), C = common (1.0-10%), F = few (0.1-1.0%), R = rare (<0.1%), r = reworked, - = absent. -
(Table 8) Distribution of Pleistocene to early Pliocene nannofossils in ODP H...
Species abundance: A = abundant (>10% of the total assemblage), C = common (1.0-10%), F = few (0.1-1.0%), R = rare (<0.1%), r = reworked, - = absent. -
(Table 7) Distribution of Maestrichtian to late Campanian nannofossils in ODP...
Species abundance: A = abundant (>10% of the total assemblage), C = common (1.0-10%), F = few (0.1-1.0%), R = rare (<0.1%), r = reworked, - = absent. -
(Table 5) Distribution of Pleistocene to late Oligocene nannofossils in ODP H...
Species abundance: A = abundant (>10% of the total assemblage), C = common (1.0-10%), F = few (0.1-1.0%), R = rare (<0.1%), r = reworked, - = absent. -
(Table 4) Distribution of Pleistocene to early Pliocene nannofossils in ODP H...
Species abundance: A = abundant (>10% of the total assemblage), C = common (1.0-10%), F = few (0.1-1.0%), R = rare (<0.1%), r = reworked, - = absent. -
(Table 3) Distribution of Pleistocene to late Miocene nannofossils in ODP Hol...
Species abundance: A = abundant (>10% of the total assemblage), C = common (1.0-10%), F = few (0.1-1.0%), R = rare (<0.1%), r = reworked, - = absent. -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 47-398D
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 47-398B
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 47-398A
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-278
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-277
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-284A
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-284
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-283
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-282
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-281A
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-281
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Nannofossil abundance of Hole 29-279A
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent) -
Calcareous nannofossil counting in the Avdat section, Northern Negev, Israel
Assemblage of calcareous nannofossil from the Avdat section in Israel was analyzed and compared to other oceanic sites. 161 samples were taken from seven subsections in the... -
Semi-quantitative microplankton analysis (Sylt Roads Time Series) in the Wadd...
0 = not present / 1 = present
