Covid-19 and Probation's Health-Related Practice, 2020-2021

DOI

This collection includes 27 qualitative surveys completed by probation staff in England about their perceptions of the impact of the response to Covid-19 on their health-related practice with people under supervision. It also includes transcripts from 11 interviews with people that were under probation supervision during the pandemic about the impact of the response to the pandemic on their health, access to healthcare, and their experience of working with probation or health services to improve their health during the pandemic. Notes from two brief follow-up conversations with probation staff which aimed to add detail to the survey findings are also included.Individuals supervised by probation are more likely to have certain health problems than the general population, often having multiple physical and mental health problems. Poor health can negatively impact on criminal justice outcomes like reoffending. In partnership with healthcare organisations, probation work to identify health needs and improve the health of people under supervision. Probation replaced office appointments with email, Skype and doorstep visits in response to the pandemic, and models of partnership working between health and justice agencies have adapted, changing how healthcare is accessed. The nature and impact of these changes for those under supervision isn't fully understood. Concerns have been raised that existing difficulties that this vulnerable group encounter with accessing healthcare may be made worse. However, the pandemic may also have led to helpful innovations in how healthcare is provided that need to be captured and spread. Following discussions with several senior probation staff, NHS England and individuals with lived experience of the criminal justice system, we have created a proposal to address this knowledge gap and thereby inform future policy and practice. We will use staff survey data and correspondence, and service user interviews to improve understanding of the nature and impact of Covid-19 responses on a) health-related probation practice, b) the lived experience of seeking health support whilst under probation supervision, and c) partnership working and pathways into care. Revolving Doors are key to capturing service user views. Through joint working with stakeholders findings will directly inform how services are provided in the future.

The study combined: - Qualitative surveys completed by probation staff: Key stakeholders in all twelve National Probation Service regions and one Community Rehabilitation Company were asked to identify 2-3 frontline staff and a senior probation officer to complete the survey. - Semi-structured telephone interviews with people that were under probation supervision during the pandemic: Probation staff were asked to identify two people who had been supervised during the pandemic and had sought help around a health need - an individual who was perceived to have had a positive experience of managing or improving their health, and an individual who was perceived to have had a more negative experience. It was made clear that participation was voluntary and declining to take part would not affect an individual's relationship with probation. As recruitment was challenging, further people that had been under probation supervision during the pandemic were recruited via Revolving Doors Agency. - Follow-up conversations with probation staff conducted via email and Microsoft Teams with individuals whose survey responses we wished to investigate in more detail. Interim findings were also shared in a mid-project workshop.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-855017
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=4f5935c5b2193eb75d33c9373afc6d2515e2dbcf4531bd3d87eb226caea11088
Provenance
Creator Sirdifield, C, University of Lincoln; Nichols, H, University of Lincoln; Mullen, P, Revolving Doors Agency; Schartau, I, HMPPS
Publisher UK Data Service
Publication Year 2021
Funding Reference Economic and Social Research Council
Rights Coral Sirdifield, University of Lincoln. Helen Nichols, University of Lincoln. Philip Mullen, Revolving Doors Agency. Imogen Schartau, HMPPS; The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.
OpenAccess true
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Text
Discipline Jurisprudence; Law; Social and Behavioural Sciences
Spatial Coverage England