Tests of Models of Recognition, Repetition Priming, and Source Memory, 2016-2020

DOI

This collection contains links to Open Science Framework repositories for six outputs, linked to the project. The data are from cognitive behavioural experiments measuring repetition priming, recognition memory and/or source memory with judgments and response times. Repository 1 contains data from experiments in which study duration was manipulated. Repository 2 contains data from experiments using a procedure that allows concurrent measurement of all three types of memory. Repository 3 contains repetition priming and recognition data from a group of individuals with synaesthesia and a control group. Repository 4 contains recognition memory data from experiments that attempted to manipulate encoding variability. Repository 5 contains cross-sectional data, in which measures taken in different age groups. Repository 6 contains data from experiments using a similar procedures to those in repository 2. The outputs, DOIs and links to the repositories are as follows: 1) Berry, C.J., Ward, E.V., & Shanks, D. R. (2017). Does study duration have opposite effects on recognition and repetition priming? Journal of Memory and Language, 97, 154-174, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.004, OSF: https://osf.io/jd8s9/; 2) Lange, N., Berry, C. J., & Hollins, T. H. (2019). Linking repetition priming, recognition and source memory: a single-system signal detection account. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.004, OSF: https://osf.io/6mtyc/; 3) Rothen, N., Berry, C. J., Seth, A. K. Oligschlager, S., & Ward, J. (2020). A single-system account of the memory advantage in synaesthesia. Memory & Cognition, 48, 188-199, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-01001-8, OSF: https://osf.io/nyqbp/; 4) Spanton, R. W., & Berry, C. J. (2020). The unequal variance signal detection model of recognition: investigating the encoding variability hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1242-1260, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820906117, OSF: https://osf.io/grqwc/; 5) Ward, E. V., Berry, C. J., Shanks, D. R., Moller, P. L., & Czsiser, E. (2020). Aging predicts decline in explicit and implicit memory: A lifespan study. Psychological Science, 31, 1071-1083, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620927648, OSF: https://osf.io/d6j4u/; 6) Lange, N. & Berry, C. J. (in press). Explaining the association between repetition priming and source memory: No evidence for a contribution of recognition or fluency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211008406, OSF: https://osf.io/r254g/. Each repository contains a codebook and supporting documentation. ttps://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620927648, OSF: https://osf.io/d6j4u/Memory comes in many different forms. Understanding how these different forms of memory operate and are enabled in the brain is a crucial goal in psychological and neuroscientific research. A fundamental question is whether there are distinct forms of memory that function independently of other kinds (multiple-systems theory), or whether different forms of memory actually draw upon the same underlying memory (single-system theory). This project will conduct rigorous tests of an existing single-system model by a) applying it to a memory task thought to be challenging for the model to explain -- source memory, and b) comparing its predictions to those of multiple-systems versions of the model in eight new experiments that are designed to discriminate between the models. In previous research, the applicant has found evidence for a single-system model of recognition memory and repetition priming, and this model was preferred to multiple-systems ones. Recognition memory involves being able to determine whether you have encountered something before, for instance, being able to say that you have seen the face of a perpetrator of a crime before. Repetition priming is a more indirect example of memory -- it is typically shown via improvements in performance when a stimulus is re-encountered; for example, when presented with a familiar face that you have seen recently, you will tend to identify it faster than a face that you have not seen for a long time. Recognition memory is a traditional example of explicit (conscious) memory, whereas repetition priming is a traditional example of implicit (unconscious) memory. The new task to be explained by the single-system model is source memory, another explicit memory task, which involves remembering specific information related to a prior encounter. For instance, source memory would be shown if you were able to remember that you saw a particular face at the scene of a crime and not at the supermarket, or if you were able to correctly remember that the colour of the jacket of the perpetrator of a crime was red and not blue. It is important for the single-system model to also explain source memory because many theories propose that the memory used to make source memory decisions is distinct from the kind of memory that drives repetition priming. If the relationship between source memory and repetition priming could be shown to follow the predictions of the single-system model, this would have important implications for these alternative theories, and would be a crucial test of the breadth of single-system views. Multivariate signal detection theory will be drawn upon in extending the model. The main assumption of the single-system model is that priming, recognition, and source are driven by the same memory signal. Specific predictions of the model will be tested experimentally. For example, the model predicts that repetition priming will be positively related to the accuracy of source memory judgments and also the confidence with which these judgments are made. It also predicts that this relationship is modulated by recognition memory. Furthermore, it predicts that experimental variables will tend to affect priming, recognition and source memory similarly, and so would be strongly challenged by experiments in which these measures are differentially affected. Experiments manipulating attention and modality of presentation at encoding will investigate this. The model will be fit to the experimental data and compared with the fit and predictions of multiple-systems models; these will incorporate competing theoretical assumptions to the single-system model and allow for various degrees of independence between the memory signals driving explicit and implicit memory.

The data were obtained from cognitive behavioural experiments designed to measure a combination of recognition memory, repetition priming, and source memory. The data in Repositories 1, 2, 3 and 5 are long-format data (responses to items, for every participant), obtained using a gradual clarification task in which a repetition priming (identification response time) and recognition and/or source memory (1-6 confidence ratings or binary old/new judgments) was measured for items in the test phase. The data in Repository 4 contains long-format recognition memory data (1-6 confidence ratings). Volunteer sampling was used. In Repository 1, N = 32, 24, 32, 18, 30, 30, 40 across Experiments 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, and 4, respectively. In Repository 2, N = 36, 36, 36, and 35 across Experiments 1, 2, 3a, and 3b, respectively. In Repository 3, n = 32 in each of the synaesthesia and control groups. In repository 4, N = 40 in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In repository 5, N = 1072. In Repository 6, N = 36 in Experiments 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-854553
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=7f2cffeea36e025f11013a89efd213331c73c547396ab5f690acaf1f8bb3c55b
Provenance
Creator Berry, C, University of Plymouth; Lange, N, University of Warwick; Spanton, R, University of Plymouth; Ward, E, Middlesex University London; Rothen, N, UniDistance Suisse
Publisher UK Data Service
Publication Year 2021
Funding Reference Economic and Social Research Council
Rights Christopher Berry, University of Plymouth. Nicholas Lange, University of Warwick. Rory Spanton, University of Plymouth. Emma Ward, Middlesex University London. Nicholas Rothen, UniDistance Suisse; The Data Collection is available from an external repository. Access is available via Related Resources.
OpenAccess true
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Numeric
Discipline Psychology; Social and Behavioural Sciences
Spatial Coverage United Kingdom