This data contains qualitative data investigating how new specialist forms of technical and market expertise have emerged to help organisations respond to potent rankings. New groups of 'influencer relations' experts can be found across industrial sectors. In this project, we have focused on those within the information and communication technology (ICT) area where there is evidence emerging that they have been highly effective in creating opportunities for local influence over global rankings, and that their presence is having consequences for (re)shaping the power of rankings more generally. Yet despite their obvious importance, we still know very little if anything about these experts and the kinds of knowledge they produce or influence they wield. The data set contains transcribed interviews with influencer relations experts as well as industry analysts. These interviews look to understand the major facets of their role, as well as with how they are able to influence industry analyst rankings. The interviews were broadly structured around the four following questions: 1. How are the new technical/market actors that have emerged going about establishing the value of their expertise? 2. What kind of knowledge are these specialists producing and how is it being commodified as part of the construction of a potential market for supplementary goods related to rankings? 3. What are the different calculative practices and technologies used by these actors in carrying out their role? 4. What consequences do these actors’ development and use of new social media technologies have for the reshaping of the broader ranking ecosystem? The research approach we have adopted is comparative involving analysis of these specialists at a number of different levels. History: We examined the emergence and evolution of this new form of influencer expertise over time by following its biography from inception through to the modern day. We have traced the birth of influencer relations back to IBM’s 1980s Armonk headquarters. We documented the key factors and actors shaping developments over the last 30 years. Geography: We contrasted how British influencer relations expertise has evolved compared to North American and to a lesser extent European counterparts. America still exerts a strong influence over this occupation (this is because it enjoys greater proximity to many of the important rankers) but the UK community appears more ‘organised’, since the majority of actors are located in or around London, making it easy for them to meet up on a regular basis (an important difference that we explored). Practices: We compared the different calculative practices that have emerged in recent years amongst these groups. Technologies: We compared the different kinds of tools developed and used. Particular attention was given to the social media tools that facilitate the separation in practice between actors developing internet data-generated scores and those relying upon more direct, and less data-intensive, forms of assessing influence.The continued proliferation of product and service rankings constitutes one of the most important challenges facing organisations today (Espeland & Sauder 2007). Few aspects of the economy and society remain untouched by rankings of one form or another. At this moment in time, however, rankings are both broadening and deepening their coverage. Certain phenomenon can be ranked many times over by different offline and increasingly online measures. New social media are being used and mined to provide novel forms of ranking and assessment. Since negative assessments, or a failure to appear on a significant ranking, can have immediate impacts upon consumer or client decision making there is no choice but to take these evaluations seriously. But this presents a new and pressing problem for organisations: given the increasing number and variety, which rankings should they respond to? And how? This project investigates how new specialist forms of technical and market specialists have emerged to help organisations confront and respond to this growing pressure. New groups of 'influencer relations' experts can be found across industrial sectors. In this project, we focus on those within the information and communication technology (ICT) area where there is evidence emerging that they have been highly effective in creating opportunities for local influence over global rankings, and that their presence is having consequences for (re)shaping the power of rankings more generally. Yet despite their obvious importance, we still know very little if anything about these experts and the kinds of knowledge they produce or influence they wield. We study these new groups as they become more organised and attempt to move from an occupation to a 'profession'. We provide a fine-grained analysis of their work and expertise, which includes exploring their 'calculative practices' and use of new 'technologies'. The calculative practices examined are their efforts to search for the rankings that make a difference in a particular product or service area, so that organisations can prioritise their response to them. We also pay particular attention to the disruptive potential of new social media technologies that form a central part of this search process. Data analytic tools and 'big data' are being deployed to aid the measurement of a ranking's influence. We investigate the influence of two such measurement tools 'TweetLevel' and 'BlogLevel', which contain algorithms that crawl blogs and social networking sites to return a 'score' based on various weighted metrics concerning the impact of a ranking. Finally, we also study how some of these experts have established independent agencies and consultancies and are attempting to create a new market for consultancy and supplementary knowledge-based products related to rankings. The methodology used will be qualitative and include semi-structured interviews and ethnography. We have secured privileged access to observe these actors within one of the key bodies - the Institute for Industry Analyst Relations (IIAR) - which is taking a leadership role in the ongoing professionalisation project. Our empirical focus is at different levels: historically, where we study the emergence and formation of this new occupation over 30 years; geographically, where we draw broad-scope links between the growth of these actors here and in the US and to a lesser extent mainland Europe; and at the level of practice, where we contrast the (potentially different) calculative practices of these groups of actors and investigate the different ways in which these experts employ new social media technologies.

The data gathered for this project comprised in-depth semi structured interviews and a small amount of participant observation. Three different sets of actors were interviewed: (i) influencer relations specialists within organisations; (ii) agency-based influencer relations consultants; and (iii) rankers themselves. We undertook 30 semi-structured 1-2 hour interviews of influencer relations professionals both here in the UK and abroad. The sample was derived from the first phase of research. Interviews covered the specific expertise of those involved within the emerging professional group, their views and experiences around the role, the use of existing practices and tools to collect information on rankings, and any issues they face when doing so, etc. These discussions were digitally recorded and fully transcribed according to normal academic standards and conventions. In terms of the more ethnographic parts of the project, the team made 15 visits to the organisation described in the proposal - the Institute of Industry Analyst Relations (IIAR) - over the 2-year period to carry out observations and ethnographic interviews. We l generate transcriptions and a researcher diary from the monthly ‘events’ held at the IIAR. These events are normally presentations (of up to 1 hour in length) given by industry professionals on topics related to the theme of the proposal, typically followed by a question and answer session (approx. 30 minutes) and informal discussions over drinks (approx. 1 hour). Given the location, it was not possible to digitally record all these sessions. For the more informal sessions, however, the fieldworker maintained a diary which he completed after (or as soon after) the meetings had finished. We have not attempted full transcriptions of all parts of these meetings as many cover a wide range of themes, only some of which may be relevant to our research questions. The research team has therefore listened to recordings and have transcribed those parts thought to be of potential interest. Physical (paper) diaries were also used during the events. This material was typed up to facilitate its later sharing.