The reasons behind the (non)use of feedback reports for quality improvement in physical therapy: a mixed-method study

DOI

Mixed methods study into the reasons physical therapists use feedback reports on the quality of care measured by quality indicators.This dataset constitutes data of three evaluation surveys, held in 2009, 2010 and 2011. Participating physical therapists in the project Qualiphy (Kwaliefy), that was meant to measure the quality of physical therapy in primary care in the Netherlands through quality indicators, were asked to evaluate the project, for example with respect to feasibility, usability of the results/feedback reports and assistance during the project. The objective of the evaluation survey was to examine whether (parts of ) the project needed to be improved and to assess whether the feedback reports were being used by participating physical therapists to improve the quality of care.This dataset does not include the raw data of the Qualiphy project, please contact the rights holder for further information.

The questionnaires are in Dutch, the codebook, project description and data file are in English.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-z5v-vyy6
Metadata Access https://lifesciences.datastations.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=doi:10.17026/dans-z5v-vyy6
Provenance
Creator M Scholte
Publisher DANS Data Station Life Sciences
Contributor M. Scholte; M.W.G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden (Radboud university medical center); J.C.C. Braspenning (Radboud university medical center)
Publication Year 2016
Rights CC0 1.0; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess; http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0
OpenAccess true
Contact M. Scholte
Representation
Resource Type Dataset
Format application/pdf; application/zip; application/x-stata-13; application/x-spss-por; application/x-spss-sav
Size 51514; 19563; 55684; 71530; 94389; 88387; 10349; 12954; 10025
Version 2.0
Discipline Life Sciences; Medicine