The Ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature

DOI

Web of Science search key to reproduce search results in the publication via the Web of Science online interface.AbstractWhile problems with cell line misidentification have been known for decades, an unknown number of published papers remains in circulation reporting on the wrong cells without warning or correction. Here we attempt to make a conservative estimate of this ‘contaminated’ literature. We found 32,755 articles reporting on research with misidentified cells, in turn cited by an estimated half a million other papers. The contamination of the literature is not decreasing over time and is anything but restricted to countries in the periphery of global science. The decades-old and often contentious attempts to stop misidentification of cell lines have proven to be insufficient. The contamination of the literature calls for a fair and reasonable notification system, warning users and readers to interpret these papers with appropriate care.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-2ap-7bnu
Metadata Access https://lifesciences.datastations.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=doi:10.17026/dans-2ap-7bnu
Provenance
Creator W. Halffman; S.P.J.M. Horbach
Publisher DANS Data Station Life Sciences
Contributor W. Halffman
Publication Year 2017
Rights DANS Licence; info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess; https://doi.org/10.17026/fp39-0x58
OpenAccess false
Contact W. Halffman
Representation
Resource Type Dataset
Format application/pdf; application/zip; application/octet-stream
Size 200690; 16923; 462492; 108401
Version 2.1
Discipline Life Sciences; Medicine